Surge planning and decision replay
Test whether the workforce can meet competing needs. Compare policies and inspect earlier staffing choices.
Competing incidents share one workforce
Several incidents can draw on the same people at the same time. A surge simulation tests whether people can cover competing incident needs. The planner defines the positions and number of people required. Each need has dates and an arrival deadline.
The planner chooses which regions may supply staff. The simulation checks qualifications and availability against the selected policy. It does not count a person twice for incompatible work.
Compare deployment policies
Rules about rest and assignment length can change how much work the team can cover. A policy draft sets rest days and maximum deployment duration. It also identifies the regions in scope. Staff can compare drafts against the same workforce snapshot.
Approval and activation are separate actions. Both keep their history. Changing a planning policy does not rewrite accepted deployment orders.
Look ahead at readiness
A team that is ready today may have gaps in the weeks ahead. Readiness forecasts look ahead 30, 60, or 90 days. They show where future needs may exceed the ready workforce. Owners can receive a notice about the result.
A saved forecast keeps its inputs and rules. Later workforce changes do not rewrite the earlier result.
Turn a reviewed template into an incident draft
Similar incidents often need a familiar starting structure. An incident template provides a reviewed starting structure. It defines units and duties. It can also include staffing and equipment requirements.
Creating an incident from the template produces a draft. The setup still needs submission and approval.
Reconstruct a staffing decision
An earlier staffing result can be hard to explain once the underlying records have changed. Decision replay reconstructs a staffing choice from its saved facts. A reviewer can inspect the eligibility explanation.
Saved scenarios can also be compared. Replay shows the earlier decision basis. A new assessment uses current facts.